Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Austin v. Kijakazi
as 3:2023cv00852
Plaintiff:
Lori K. Austin
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA-Email Notification
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Austin v. Gurly et al
as 2:2023cv00316
Plaintiff:
Cortnee K Austin and Courtnee K Austin
Defendant:
Gurly, Love and Pettway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. Gober et al
as 4:2022cv00300
Plaintiff:
Donna K Austin
Defendant:
Mark Gober and Susan Potts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mahan v. Nagy et al
as 2:2022cv10489
Plaintiff:
Tyrone William Mahan
Defendant:
N. Nagy, S. Bailey, J. White and others
Adams v. US
as 21-1662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICHAEL T. ANGELO, CODY L. ADAMS, DARA W. ALLICK and others
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
CONNER, et al v. CITY OF CENTERVILLE GA, et al
as 5:2021cv00055
Defendant:
Victor Conner, DAMIR MEHMEDIC, WESLEY NEESMITH and others
Plaintiff:
VICTOR K. CONNER, JESSICA CONNER and K AUSTIN CONNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
AUSTIN v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv14584
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER COMPANIES, INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
JANICE K. AUSTIN
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Broadhead v. Siddiq et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2016cv00694
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
Dr. Siddiq, S. Howard, LPN Roders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sachs v. Noumbissi et al
as 8:2016cv02224
Defendant:
Sammy Noumbissi, DDS and Miles of Smiles Dental Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
K. Austin Sachs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sachs v. Noumbissi et al
as 1:2016cv02224
Defendant:
Sammy Noumbissi, DDS and Miles of Smiles Dental Associates, LLC
Plaintiff:
K. Austin Sachs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
