Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Frank v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2023cv03767
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Frank
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Moorhead Police department, Zach Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raburn v. Henderson County Jail et al
as 6:2021cv00399
Plaintiff:
Jack Cody Raburn
Defendant:
Henderson County Jail, Major Faught, Captain Bernett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Dumond v. Miami-Dade Police Department, et al
as 21-13353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DANIEL DUMOND
Defendant / Appellee:
MIAMI-DADE POLICE DEPARTMENT, The Midwest Division Kendall District, K-9 BONE, (dog), K-9 Unit Miami Dade Police Department and WILLIAM ARROWSMITH, K9 Unit Dept. 030
David Meyers v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6674
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN IVAN GILMORE, Chief Warden, COUNSELOR R. BRITT, ANGELA WETHINGTON, Operations Manager/PREA Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Eads v. Wood County Police Dept. K9 Unit
as 3:2020cv00219
Defendant:
Wood County Police Dept. K9 Unit
Plaintiff:
William C. Eads, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Meyers v. Gilmore et al
as 2:2020cv00444
Defendant:
Ofc. Cornelius Bland, Joseph Walters, QMHP - Ms. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
David Meyers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
VIVIANS v. LOWE et al
as 3:2020cv00107
Defendant:
K9 UNIT, LOWE, SEVERAL UNKNOWN OFFICERS and others
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY VIVIANS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Majied Lewis v. Chesapeake Police
as 17-7328
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAJIED LEWIS
Defendant - Appellee:
CHESAPEAKE POLICE DEPARTMENT, K9 Unit Boomer
Aguilera v. Omaha Police Department et al
as 8:2017cv00189
Defendant:
Brian A., City of Omaha, Joshua Downs and others
Plaintiff:
Philip A. Aguilera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deal v. K9 Unit Captain (INMATE 1)
as 2:2016cv00358
Plaintiff:
Allen Lee Deal
Defendant:
K9 Unit Captain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
