Cases 31 - 40 of 9,955
Wade v. State of South Carolina et al
as 4:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
Roy Lee Wade
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, Department of Mental Health, Kelly Gothard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Trevino v. Rowe et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe and FNU LNU (5:24-CV-88)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Merrival v. Pennington County et al
as 4:2024cv04064
Plaintiff:
Michael Lynn Merrival, Jr.
Defendant:
Pennington County, Kellie Wasko, Amber Pirraglia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Bennett et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00201
Plaintiff:
Eddie Jerome Kelly
Defendant:
Lt. Bennett, Joseph H. Headley and Warden Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Newson v. Newson et al
as 3:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Devoris Newson
Defendant:
Dennis H. Newson, Go 2 Inn Suites and Inspire Apartment, El Paso Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FREEMAN v. EMPLOYEES OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE et al
as 2:2024cv01270
Plaintiff:
BRIAN KELLY FREEMAN
Defendant:
EMPLOYEES OF THE PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, RICHARD KWIATKOWSKI and MARIA ROSARIA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HARRISON-EL v. BUCKS COUNTY CORR. FACILITY et al
as 2:2024cv01300
Plaintiff:
ALI A.I. HARRISON-EL
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORR. FACILITY, KELLY REED, SPRNTNDNT. MATILLUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly McSean v. Chris Chamberlain, et al
as 24-1674
Plaintiff:
Kelly La Gale McSean
Defendant:
Chris Chamberlain, Head of Security, Jeff Cunningham, Sally Port Supervisor, Misty Kindle, Physician and others
Kelly v. USA
as 2:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Larry W Kelly, Jr
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
