Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Emerson v. Parker
as 24-40041
Petitioner:
Philip James Emerson, Jr.
Respondent:
Jerry Parker, Kevin White and Kelly Cole
Emerson v. Parker et al
as 6:2023cv00453
Petitioner:
Philip James Emerson, Jr
Respondent:
Jerry Parker, Kevin White and Kelly Cole
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
White v. Hendricks
as 1:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Kevin White
Defendant:
Joe Hendricks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Larry Grady v. Kevin White, et al
as 23-10217
Petitioner / Appellant:
LARRY JEROME GRADY
Respondent / Appellee:
KEVIN WHITE, ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OF ALABAMA and others
WHITE v. RULE
as 2:2023cv00097
Petitioner:
KEVIN WHITE
Respondent:
T. RULE and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Williams v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv10537
Plaintiff:
Alexander Williams and Alexander Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
City of New York, Security Captain Ganies, C.O. K. Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Rule
as 4:2022cv01179
Petitioner:
Kevin White
Respondent:
T. Rule and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Grady v. White et al (INMATE 3)
as 3:2022cv00508
Plaintiff:
Larry Jerome Grady
Defendant:
Kevin White, Steven T. Marshall, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
White v. USA
as 7:2022cv00122
Petitioner:
Kevin White
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Green v. White et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00191
Plaintiff:
Byron Denard Green
Defendant:
Kevin White, Steven T. Marshall, State of Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
