Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00306
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Smith et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2023cv01549
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Smith and Kristi Smith
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00016
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Cox v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00275
Plaintiff:
Don Michael Cox
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benton v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00277
Plaintiff:
Benny Benton
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Payne et al
as 3:2022cv00276
Plaintiff:
Shane Price
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Moses Jackson, III, John Moss and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHAMBERS v. STATE OF INDIANA et al
as 1:2022cv00492
Plaintiff:
KENNETH CHAMBERS
Defendant:
STATE OF INDIANA, DENNIS QUAKENBUSH, JOSH CAREY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Rights - Denial of Due Process
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01774
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Smith v. Clover Park School District No 400
as 3:2021cv05767
Plaintiff:
Kristi Smith
Defendant:
Clover Park School District No 400
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv07237
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC.
Plaintiff:
KRISTY SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
