Cases 1 - 10 of 27
Ellis v. Sifuentes et al
as 4:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
Christian Jamal Ellis
Defendant:
Anthony Sifuentes, Marquis Taylor, L Dunlap and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Urell v. Colgate-Palmolive Company et al
as 2:2023cv03652
Plaintiff:
Susan F. Urell
Defendant:
Colgate-Palmolive Company, Marsha Butler, Hecho Studios LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Dunlap v. Stirling et al
as 1:2021cv00937
Plaintiff:
Johnathan L. Dunlap
Defendant:
Marquita McCullough, Michael McCall, Sam Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Riemer et al v. Ott et al
as 2:2018cv01220
Defendant:
Mike Cady, Linda Jimenez Saafir, Corporation Counsel and others
Plaintiff:
Estate of Christine Marie Riemer, Christine Marie Riemer, Estate of C R R and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Stephanie L Dunlap
as 2:2017cv05789
Defendant:
Stephanie L Dunlap
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Dunlap v. Colvin
as 1:2015cv02139
Plaintiff:
Tammy L. Dunlap
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Cyrus Sanders v. County of Bradford, et al
as 15-3169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYRUS R. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF BRADFORD, DANIEL J. BARRETT, Bradford County District Attorney, OFFICERS UNKNOWN, MONTGOMERY COUNTY and others
Dunlap et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv29944
Plaintiff:
Alora L. Dunlap and Steve Dunlap
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cyrus Sanders v. County of Bradford, et al
as 13-4229
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CYRUS R. SANDERS
Defendant - Appellee:
COUNTY OF BRADFORD, DISTRICT ATTORNEY BRADFORD COUNTY, DISTRICT ATTORNEY MONTGOMERY COUNTY and others
Debtor - Appellee:
JAMES VANNESS, PRIVATE ACTORS*
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
