Cases 1 - 10 of 1,027
BOLIN v. TELL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
DANNY R. BOLIN
Defendant:
TELL CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JASON SHADWICK, BRYCE HAMMACK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone et al v. Baca-Cook et al
as 2:2024cv00745
Plaintiff:
Domonic R. Malone, Delbert Greene and Jamal Johnson
Defendant:
Heather Baca-Cook, Cornelius Finley, Patrick Moreda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Neal
as 24-40234
Plaintiff:
Logan Wesley, III
Defendant:
Jeff Neal, Sheriff, FNU Walker, Captain, FNU Malone, Sergeant and others
Beal v. Greenman et al
as 4:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
Camarion Beal
Defendant:
Andrew Greenman, Sam Dotson, Gregory Klipsch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Malone v. Dix
as 3:2024cv00059
Petitioner:
William Malone, Jr.
Respondent:
Sheriff Darrell Dix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Malone v. Spalding County
as 3:2024cv00060
Plaintiff:
William Malone, Jr.
Defendant:
Spalding County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Richards et al
as 4:2024cv00261
Plaintiff:
Brian RaMon Hughes
Defendant:
Haynes, Caffey, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Richards et al
as 5:2024cv05069
Plaintiff:
Brian Ramon Hughes
Defendant:
Sergeant Marilyn Richards, Corporal Haynes, Corporal Caffey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bell v. Moore et al
as 1:2024cv00453
Plaintiff:
Alphonso Bell
Defendant:
Moore, Hirst, Dolan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Olmos #196384 v. Copciac et al
as 3:2024cv08048
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Olmos
Defendant:
Amanda Copciac, Jocelyn Myers, Jeff Gallimore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
