Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Waldon, et al v. Davis
as 15-3205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PEGGY S. WALDON, JAMES CHARLES WALDON and MARILYN SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
GRANT DAVIS
Smith v. Dixon Direct Corporation d/b/a Dixon Direct et al
as 1:2015cv07552
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Smith
Defendant:
Dixon Direct Corporation , Visant Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Visant Holding Corporation and Unicare Life & Health Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Julie Williams et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01283
Plaintiff:
Julie Williams , Billy Bailey , Marilyn Anderson and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc , McKesson Corporation and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Julie Williams et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as CAC/2:15-cv-01626
Plaintiff:
Julie Williams , Billy Bailey , Marilyn Anderson and others
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc. , McKesson Corporation and Does
Julie Williams et al v. Pfizer Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv01626
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Anderson, Willie D. Anderson, Billy Bailey and others
Defendant:
Does, McKesson Corporation and Pfizer Inc.
Smith v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al
as 5:2014cv01513
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Smith
Defendant:
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and MetLife, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132
Smith v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2014cv03059
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Smith
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Osburn v. Snyder et al
as 4:2013cv00701
Plaintiff:
Kenneth R Osburn
Defendant:
Jim Snyder, Levett Whitfield, Crystal Davidson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Rhodes et al
as 4:2012cv00597
Plaintiff:
Josephine Dennis
Defendant:
Brenda T. Rhodes, Shelly Terrill, Walter Z. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-2039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
