Cases 41 - 50 of 21,797
MARSHALL v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
SHAWN MARSHALL A.K.A. DEEZ NUTZ
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES, LLC, KELCY PENNINGTON and COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Marshall Scarborough
as 24-4224
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARSHALL RAY SCARBOROUGH
Mills v. Hamm et al (DEATH PENALTY)
as 2:2024cv00253
Plaintiff:
Jamie Mills
Defendant:
John Hamm, Terry Raybon, Kay Ivey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gowers v. Johnson et al
as 1:2024cv01822
Plaintiff:
Robin Denise Gowers
Defendant:
Jeffrey Johnson, Synergy Investing, LLC, Meredith Shearer & Associates and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract
USA, et al v. LHC Group, Inc.
as 24-5393
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel, VIB PARTNERS and LEANN MARSHALL, United States of America, ex rel
Defendant:
LHC GROUP, INC.
Stockton v. Reed et al
as 4:2024cv00365
Plaintiff:
Joshua Stockton
Defendant:
Marshal Reed, Aundrea Culclager, Joe Page, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frey et al v. Brunkhorst
as 3:2024cv00515
Plaintiff:
Anne Frey and Marshall Frey
Defendant:
Michelle Brunkhorst
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
The Estate of Joe Nathan James, Jr. v. Kay Ivey, et al
as 24-11273
Plaintiff:
THE ESTATE OF JOE NATHAN JAMES, JR.
Defendant:
KAY IVEY, JOHN Q. HAMM, TERRY RAYBON and others
Stallworth et al v. Barton et al
as 2:2024cv00243
Plaintiff:
Jermari Marshall and Twyla Stallworth
Defendant:
John G. Barton and City of Andalusia, Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jennifer Marshall v. Ricolcol
as 5:2024cv00885
Petitioner:
Jennifer Marshall
Respondent:
Warden Ricolcol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
