Cases 1 - 10 of 9,945
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv04648
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Neal v. Cotton Girls LLC et al
as 1:2025cv00260
Plaintiff:
Spencer Neal
Defendant:
Cotton Girls LLC and Seward's Folly, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilites Act
SC Codeworks LLC v. Kohan et al
as 2:2025cv00574
Plaintiff:
SC CODEWORKS LLC
Defendant:
John Kohan and Neal Kohan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv04570
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Bookman v. Slayton et al
as 4:2025cv00236
Petitioner:
Clarence Dewayne Bookman, II
Respondent:
David W Slayton, Tiana J Murillo, Russanda Neal and others
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Buda et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2025cv04229
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Carrier Fire & Security Americas, LLC, Carrier Fire & Security Corporation, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Victor Buda, Lora Nicole Woodruff, Elayne N. Samarkos and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Neal v. Simmons et al.
as 1:2025cv00734
Plaintiff:
Quentin M Neal
Defendant:
Diana Simmons, Sara English, Tonya Wesner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Kinzhuma
as 25-2051
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
DARWIN NEAL KINZHUMA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv04480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Zeigenbein v. Centurion et al
as 2:2025cv00038
Plaintiff:
Louis Neal Zeigenbein
Defendant:
Centurion, Laurel Raines, Syndee Serr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
