Cases 1 - 10 of 9,359
Zaslavsky v. Consumer Attorneys Association of Los Angeles, et al.
as 24-2367
Plaintiff:
NEAL S. ZASLAVSKY, ATTORNEY, an individual
Defendant:
CONSUMER ATTORNEYS ASSOCIATION OF LOS ANGELES, a California non-profit corporation, MINH TRI NGUYEN, an individual, IBIERE SECK, an individual and others
Neal v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv08011
Petitioner:
John Lee Neal
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Holland v. Shew
as 5:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Brandon Neal Holland
Respondent:
Chris Shew
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Eckerd v. Jump
as 2:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Andrew William Eckerd
Respondent:
E. Neal Jump
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harp v. Neal
as 5:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Levi Harp
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wesley v. Neal
as 24-40234
Plaintiff:
Logan Wesley, III
Defendant:
Jeff Neal, Sheriff, FNU Walker, Captain, FNU Malone, Sergeant and others
Carr et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00460
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eddie Carr, Jazemine Adams, Brandon D Alexander-Pryor and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Mourice Neal El v. Showman
as 24-3296
Plaintiff:
MOURICE NEAL EL
Defendant:
SHERIFF OFFICER MICHAEL SHOWMAN, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02929
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Stokes v. Neal et al
as 5:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Cory Lee Stokes
Defendant:
Jeffrey Neal and Correctional Officer FNU Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
