Cases 1 - 10 of 2,243
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Moore v. David George Hilburn et al
as 4:2024cv01576
Plaintiff:
Denver Kyle Moore
Defendant:
David George Hilburn, Anjelica Harris, E. R. Turnbull and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearl Henyard v. CTA, et al
as 24-1702
Plaintiff:
PEARL HENYARD
Defendant:
CHICAGO TRANSIT AUTHORITY and PACE
Derrick Jacobs v. City of Philadelphia, et al
as 24-1696
Plaintiff:
DERRICK U. JACOBS
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE, LAWRENCE S. KRASNER and others
BAZELON et al v. PACE GALLERY OF NEW YORK, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01686
Plaintiff:
RICHARD L. BAZELON and JONATHAN D. SOKOLOFF
Defendant:
PACE GALLERY OF NEW YORK, INC. and PACE GALLERY LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Stepanoff et al v. Bite Ninja, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02252
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stepanoff, Bradley McKinney, Ryan P. Cooper and others
Defendant:
Bite Ninja, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
McKinsey-Pace v. Douglas County Sheriff Office
as 6:2024cv00653
Plaintiff:
David D. McKinsey-Pace
Defendant:
Douglas County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gray v. Pace Academy et al
as 2:2024cv10971
Plaintiff:
GRITIANA GRAY
Defendant:
PACE ACADEMY, JOSEPH POLLACK, ACADEMIC CENTER OF EXCELLENCE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pace v. Oliver et al
as 1:2024cv01557
Plaintiff:
Lyndon Fitzgerald Pace
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Christopher Carr and Shawn Emmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pace v. Unknown
as 2:2024cv00226
Plaintiff:
Christopher R. Pace, Jr.
Defendant:
Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
