Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 100
CHISHOLM v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2026vv01321
Petitioner: RODRICK CHISHOLM
Respondent: SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
DOBY v. VIRGIL
as 1:2026cv00870
Plaintiff: RYAN GABRIEL DOBY
Defendant: RODRICK VIRGIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Rodrick Berklery
as 26-6897
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant: RODRICK BERKLERY
Mitchell v. United Parcel Service, Inc. et al
as 1:2026cv00362
Plaintiff: Joshua C. Mitchell
Defendant: United Parcel Service, Inc., Teamsters Local Union No. 988, The City of Beaumont, Texas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Young v. Lowes Home Improvement, LLC et al
as 1:2026cv04332
Plaintiff: Rodrick Young
Defendant: Lowes Home Improvement, LLC and John Does 1-4
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Littleton v. The Home Depot et al
as 1:2026cv13426
Plaintiff: Reba Littleton
Defendant: The Home Depot, Annette Rodrick and James S. Hannon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218 (2) Americans with Disabilities Act
Climmons v. Bean et al
as 2:2026cv02224
Plaintiff: Rodrick Climmons
Defendant: Jeremy Bean, Kim McCoy, Steward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GALLO v. TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER et al
as 3:2026cv08922
Plaintiff: ALEJANDRA GALLO
Defendant: TOWNSHIP OF TOMS RIVER, MAYOR DANIEL RODRICK, JONATHAN SALONIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Thomas v. Hoffman et al
as 3:2026cv01117
Plaintiff: Xander Thomas
Defendant: Matthew Hoffman, City of Bridgeport and Rodrick Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodrick Cannon v. Jeff Nines
as 26-6730
Petitioner: RODRICK D. CANNON
Respondent: WARDEN JEFF NINES and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?