Cases 1 - 10 of 39
FLETCHER v. RULE et al
as 2:2023cv00306
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY L. FLETCHER
Defendant:
T. RULE, DEUSCH, MAKELLAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
JACKSON-BEY v. KALLIS et al
as 2:2023cv00229
Plaintiff:
HANEEF SHAKE EL JACKSON-BEY
Defendant:
S. KALLIS, UNKNOWN NAMED OFFICER, ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDY COORDINATOR (A.R.C.), A. FRENCH and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Martin v. Thompson et al
as 2:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Arthur Martin
Defendant:
Andrew J. Thompson and Shapero & Roloff Co., L.P.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Spencer-Roloff v. United States of America
as 3:2020cv02363
Plaintiff:
Bobby Jean Spencer-Roloff
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
AJAJ v. KRUGER et al
as 2:2020cv00244
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, JASON DODGE, DAVID FLOYD and others
Plaintiff:
AHMAD M. AJAJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cavan v. United States of America et al
as 0:2020cv01072
Defendant:
Ms. Voss, Mr. Armstrong, Dr. Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Seui Cavan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Graham v. McClarty et al
as 1:2020cv00531
Defendant:
Jeremy Breden, Jesse Malone, Lucinda Mcclarty and others
Plaintiff:
Dontraya Graham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Roloff v. Cichocki et al
as 1:2019cv10411
Plaintiff:
Michelle Roloff
Defendant:
Dolly Hwang and Timothy Cichocki
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Herrera Portillo v. Lance et al
as 3:2019cv00222
Defendant:
Larry R. Roloff and Clayton Lance
Plaintiff:
Rodolfo W. Herrera Portillo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLETT v. POMPEO et al
as 1:2018cv01707
Defendant:
PATRICK P O'CARROLL, MICHAEL R. POMPEO, JOHN D WILCOCK and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY WILLETT and JEFFREY M. WILLETT
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
