Cases 31 - 40 of 2,320
Channel Partners Capital, LLC v. Maple Management LLC et al
as 1:2024cv01128
Plaintiff:
Channel Partners Capital, LLC
Defendant:
Maple Management LLC doing business as RAE Elevators & Lifts and James Mecha
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Whitaker v. Rae et al
as 3:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Brandon Whitaker
Defendant:
Mark Rae and Russell Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024vv00115
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 300 Vaccine Injury Act
Osirio v. Horga et al
as 2:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Rae Osirio, Jr.
Defendant:
Benjamin Horga, Unknown Horga, Paul Penzone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abarca et al v. AmeriHome Mortgage
as 3:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Monica Rae Abarca and Jose Louis Abarca
Defendant:
AmeriHome Mortgage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Faulkenberry v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00009
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Faulkenberry and Cynthia Rae Faulkenberry
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Dick v. Barksdale et al
as 5:2024cv00001
Defendant:
John Coleman Barksdale, Jr., John Coleman Barksdale, Penske Logistics LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Jessica Rae Dick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
