Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04958
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01168
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Pierce v. Bailey et al
as 1:2022cv00863
Plaintiff:
Perry Pierce
Defendant:
P. Bailey, Unknown Herbert and K. Robbinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. FPI Management Inc et al
as 2:2022cv00336
Defendant:
Mehrdad Rahimzadeh, FPI Management Inc, Cindy Hager and others
Plaintiff:
Henry James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. P.I.C.C.
as 2:2021cv03813
Plaintiff:
ANDY ORTIZ
Defendant:
P.I.C.C., C/O: GIBSON, C/O: BAILEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
AIKEN v. PHILPIN et al
as 1:2019cv00191
Defendant:
Sgt. Perry, Sergeant Wilcox, DOCTOR WANTS and others
Plaintiff:
Jay Junior Aiken
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aaron et al v. United States of America, Department Of Health Of Human Services
as 1:2019cv00598
Plaintiff:
Arlene Fait, Roger Johnson, Clara Tubbs-Hill and others
Defendant:
Benjamin C. Glassman and United States of America, Department Of Health Of Human Services
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
AIKEN v. PHILPIN et al
as 5:2019cv00054
Defendant:
MARK TAYLOR, LIEUTENANT LESTER, ANGELA GLOVER and others
Plaintiff:
JAY JUNIOR AIKEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saulsberry v. Pate et al
as 4:2017cv00431
Plaintiff:
Lee Andrew Saulsberry
Defendant:
Mark Pate, Ricky Shourd, Dorthy Robbinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
