Cases 21 - 30 of 56
Calhoun et al v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2017mi00004
Defendant:
City of Atlanta , Richard Pennington , Marlon O. Noble and others
Plaintiff:
Geoffrey Calhoun , Benjamin Cheaves , John Curran and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Porter v. Protect Us Now, LLC
as 9:2016cv81734
Plaintiff:
William Porter
Defendant:
Protect Us Now, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
White et al v. Mosby et al
as 1:2016cv02663
Plaintiff:
Alicia White and William Porter
Defendant:
Marilyn Mosby , Samuel Cogan and State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Porter v. United States of America (INMATE 3)
as 1:2015cv00790
Plaintiff:
William Porter
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Lloyd Crabtree v. Lauren Parish, et al
as 15-41248
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LLOYD H. CRABTREE
Defendant - Appellee:
LAUREN PARISH, Judge, also known as Laurn Parish, BILLY BYRD, Upshur County District Attorney and WILLIAM PORTER, Visiting Judge
Welgus v. Trinet Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv03625
Plaintiff:
Howard Welgus
Defendant:
Trinet Group, Inc. , Burton M. Goldfield and William Porter
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Crabtree v. Parish et al
as 6:2015cv00015
Plaintiff:
Lloyd H Crabtree
Defendant:
Laurn Parish , Billy Byrd and William Porter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv00748
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
USA v. William Porter
as 13-13584
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
WILLIAM PORTER
Dawson et al v. Commonwealth Recycled Aggregates, Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00734
Plaintiff:
Edward Dawson , Paul Martin , Paul Myers and others
Defendant:
Commonwealth Recycled Aggregates, Inc., B & S Site Development, Inc. and Michael L. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
