Cases 21 - 30 of 7,467
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS et al v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
LANCE WALTERS and CARINA WALTERS
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, VASQUEZ, T. JADRICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WALTERS v. FORRESTAL et al
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
LANCE WAYNE WALTERS and CARINA
Defendant:
KERRY J. FORRESTAL, SITZMAN, OROZCO-JIMENEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cutshaw v. Sterlin ET AL et al
as 0:2024cv01947
Plaintiff:
Daniel Wayne Cutshaw
Defendant:
Brian Sterlin ET AL, South Carolina Department of Corrections, Lt Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Bell v. Nue, et al.
as 4:2024cv00315
Plaintiff:
Orenthial Jamal Bell
Defendant:
Olivia Nue, Lt. David Walters #217, Sgt. Parsons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Caldwell v. Bowers et al
as 6:2024cv06051
Plaintiff:
Samuel Walter Caldwell
Defendant:
Deputy Director Syrna Bowers, MEDICAL SERVICES MGR Dana Haynes, RN Kelly Aunspaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blalock v. Corley et al
as 3:2024cv00647
Plaintiff:
Karel Blalock
Defendant:
Lt. Corley, Lt. K.L. Strong, Captain A. Eberling and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crawley #230375 v. Hope College et al
as 1:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Walter Crawley #230375
Defendant:
Hope College, Richard Raymond, David Stubbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vaughn v. The State of Arkansas / ADC
as 4:2024cv04030
Petitioner:
Walter Earnest Vaughn, III
Respondent:
The State of Arkansas / ADC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
