Cases 11 - 20 of 70
Coleman et al v. Campbell County Public Library Board of Trustees
as 2:2012cv00030
Plaintiff:
Charlie Coleman , John P. Roth, Jr. and Erik Hermes
Defendant:
Campbell County Public Library Board of Trustees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hunter v. Salem, Missouri, City of et al
as 4:2012cv00004
Plaintiff:
Anaka Hunter
Defendant:
Salem, Missouri, City of , Board of Trustees, Salem Public Library and Glenda Woffard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perales v. Fullerton Public Library et al
as 1:2011cv01218
Plaintiff:
Azael Dythian Perales
Defendant:
Fullerton Public Library, City of Fullerton, Griffin Structures Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 11-2184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
James Pietrangelo, II v. Sandusky Library, et al
as 10-3843
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. PIETRANGELO, II
Defendant - Appellee:
SANDUSKY LIBRARY, TERRI ESTEL, CITY OF SANDUSKY, OHIO and others
Holiday Public Relations & Events, LLC et al v. The Edgartown Library Foundation, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv12136
Defendant:
The Edgartown Library Foundation, Inc., Melissa Aldeborgh, Anne Vose and others
Plaintiff:
Holiday Public Relations & Events, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Doe v. City of Albuquerque
as 1:2008cv01041
Defendant:
City of Albuquerque and City of Albuquerque
Plaintiff:
John Doe, John Doe and John Doe
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00918
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Thivierge v. Town of Amesbury, et al
as 10-1389
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES N. THIVIERGE
Defendant - Appellee:
AMESBURY, MA, THATCHER W. KEZER, III, AMESBURY, MA TOWN ASSESSOR and others
Urwiler v. Deerfield Public Library
as 1:2011cv03115
Plaintiff:
Sheila Urwiler
Defendant:
Deerfield Public Library
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.