Cases 1 - 10 of 6,744
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deramus v. Lee et al
as 5:2024ct03127
Plaintiff:
Willie Darnell Deramus
Defendant:
J. Nuna Lee, Sgt. B. Overton, Lt. Spruill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowen v. Davis et al
as 2:2024cv00330
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kendall Bowen
Defendant:
Deputy Billy Davis, D. Williams, Lt. Greer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Authement v. Card et al
as 6:2024cv06068
Plaintiff:
Jerry Peter Authement
Defendant:
Cpl Mark Card, Samae Tucker, Sgt Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barton v. Boyd et al
as 8:2024cv00180
Plaintiff:
James Barton
Defendant:
Taggart Boyd, Michele Wilholm, Case Manager Hassan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarango v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2024cv01129
Plaintiff:
Jesus A Tarango
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Buckeye, City of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SAGE v. CRAWFORD et al
as 2:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LOUIS SAGE
Defendant:
CRAWFORD, STROSNIDER, VAUGHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. White et al
as 3:2024cv00081
Plaintiff:
Curtis Morris
Defendant:
Jacob White and J B Hoyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - 42:1983 Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. CARR et al
as 3:2024cv00211
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
J E CARR, T DYKES, C W CATTNACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Wellpath et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael Thornton
Defendant:
Wellpath, W. Whitney, Srinath Kamineni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
