Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Kiontae Mack v. City of Chicago, et al
as 23-2662
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KIONTAE MACK
Defendant / Appellee:
CITY OF CHICAGO, PAUL MADERER, Detective, Star No. 21246, DAVID ROBERTS, Detective, Star No. 20764 and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00908
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
ROBERTS v. MALONE et al
as 2:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
BRYAN DAVID ROBERTS, SR.
Defendant:
IAN MALONE, OFFICER WAGNER FARRELL and OFFICER MASSEY SCOTT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00060
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00046
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
DENNY v. BOWLING et al
as 2:2022cv00577
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBERT DENNY
Defendant:
TYLER BOWLING and JOSH PAXTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
David Roberts v. City Hall County of Riverside
as 5:2022cv01832
Plaintiff:
David Roberts
Defendant:
City Hall County of Riverside
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Seever v. City of Modesto, et al.
as 1:2021cv01373
Plaintiff:
David Robert Seever
Defendant:
City of Modesto, Joseph Lamantia and Galen Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Allen v. Ulrich et al
as 2:2019cv00830
Plaintiff:
David Robert Rosario and Tina Allen
Defendant:
John Doe and Michael Ulrich
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2019cv04001
Defendant:
Sgt. Hoover, P.O. Robinson, K. Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Kiontae Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
