Cases 51 - 60 of 4,911
Brooks v. Gallagher et al
as 4:2024cv05028
Plaintiff:
Carl Alonzo Brooks
Defendant:
K Gallagher, Lisa Robtoy, Lori Ramsdellgilkey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Terrell v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 24-1079
Petitioner:
BROOKS TERRELL
Respondent:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cherry v. Higgins et al
as 4:2024cv00172
Plaintiff:
Charles Cherry
Defendant:
Eric Higgins, Holmes, Fry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CHATMAN et al v. LOCKE et al
as 2:2024cv00235
Plaintiff:
DAJUNT CHATMAN, DAJUNT PORTER, LASHAN BRYANT and others
Defendant:
DETECTIVE NORMAN LOCKE, OFFICER KIRK KOTCHIG, DAVID REICH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Love v. Prosper et al
as 2:2024cv00252
Plaintiff:
Deron Darnell Love
Defendant:
Bridgette Prosper, Yanu Pusich, Warden Hepp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelnutt v. McLaughlin et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Keneth Kaylon Shelnutt
Defendant:
Josh McLaughlin, Brady Aderholt, Gray West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemons v. Anglea et al
as 3:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Lemons
Defendant:
C. Anglea, Mr. Brooks and FCI Sheridan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Brooks v. Arkansas Division of Correction et al
as 6:2024cv06020
Plaintiff:
Dale Roslyn Brooks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Correction, Arkansas, State of, D Earl and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brooks v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv00557
Petitioner:
Charvez Brooks
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Smith #340475 v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00179
Plaintiff:
Paris J. Smith #340475
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, Jeremy Bush and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
