Cases 1 - 10 of 16,261
Elliott v. State of Missouri
as 4:2024cv00357
Petitioner:
Stephen Lee Elliott
Respondent:
State of Missouri
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Keer v. Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office et al
as 1:2024cv00818
Petitioner:
Timothy Stephen Keer
Respondent:
Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office and Warden of SCI-Quehanna Boot Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jackson v. Asotin County et al
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Stephen R Jackson, Sr
Defendant:
Asotin County, Asotin County Sheriffs Department, John Hilderbrand and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buford v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00438
Plaintiff:
Stephen Louis Shermond Buford
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, James Gibson and Anthony Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rouse v. Godfrey et al
as 5:2024ct03115
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lindell Rouse
Defendant:
John Godfrey, Marshall Pike, Cathy Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Beatty v. Kennedy
as 1:2024cv11284
Petitioner:
Joseph W Beatty
Respondent:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Watson v. Smith
as 1:2024cv00567
Petitioner:
Dale William Watson
Respondent:
Stephen Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baumgardner v. Idaho Department of Correction
as 1:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Stephen Mark Baumgardner
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Correction
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Reynolds
as 2:2024cv02368
Petitioner:
Gage L. Smith
Respondent:
Warden Stephen Reynolds
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Baker v. Stephens
as 1:2024cv00166
Plaintiff:
Thomas C. Baker
Defendant:
Zena Stephens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
