Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Richard Darrell Trigg v. Mary Katherine Jone
as 17-1801
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RICHARD DARRELL TRIGG
Defendant - Appellee:
MARY KATHERINE JONES, ERNEST HAROLD JONES, JERI MORRILL and others
DUNLEAVY et al v. STAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
as 2:2017cv00299
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL R. DUNLEAVY , THOMAS H. HIGGINS , THOMAS R. MCINTYRE, JR. and others
Defendant:
STAR ELECTRIC COMPANY, INC.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hale v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2016cv00881
Plaintiff:
Kilian Hale
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of , Joseph M Arpaio , Nicholas Contino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Scales v. Jones
as 3:2015cv00089
Plaintiff:
Ephron Scales
Defendant:
Chad Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:13-cv-11670
Plaintiff:
Regina Jones and Chad Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Jones et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv11670
Plaintiff:
Regina Jones and Chad Jones
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
City of Charleston v. Boggess et al
as 2:2012cv00225
Plaintiff:
City of Charleston
Defendant:
Myron G. Boggess, William L. Gill, Eric N. Abilmona and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Jones v. Edwards et al
as 2:2011cv00088
Plaintiff:
Byron Chad Jones
Defendant:
Richard Edwards, Jr, Ryan Gary, Derrick Haught and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones et al v. Principal Financial Group Inc et al
as 5:2009cv00967
Plaintiff:
Chad Jones and Amber Jones
Defendant:
Principal Financial Group Inc and Principal Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
EDWARDS ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL, INC. v. DEEM, LLC et al
as 1:2008cv01717
Plaintiff:
EDWARDS ELECTRICAL & MECHANICAL, INC.
Defendant:
DEEM, LLC, GARY EDWARDS, CHAD JONES and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
