Cases 11 - 20 of 32
WILSON et al v. RAM-T CORPORATION et al
as 2:2017cv00291
Plaintiff:
CAMERON WILSON and TOMAYO SHEPHERD
Defendant:
RAM-T CORPORATION and DEBORAH TURNER
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
McGirr et al v. Rehme et al
as 1:2016cv00464
Plaintiff:
Connie McGirr , Mary Ann Bailey , Debbie Carman-Staton and others
Defendant:
Thomas F. Rehme , Waite, Schneider, Bayless, & Chesley Co., LPA and Stanley M. Chesley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. QuikTrip Corporation
as 1:2014cv00820
Plaintiff:
Deborah Turner
Defendant:
QuikTrip Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Turner et al v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
as 2:2014cv11145
Plaintiff:
Dean Turner and Deborah Turner
Defendant:
Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amos v. Hobbs et al
as 5:2013cv00058
Plaintiff:
Calvin Amos
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs, Wendy Kelley, Sherri Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00264
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Turner v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv08766
Plaintiff:
Deborah Turner
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc., Ethicon, LLC and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Turner et al v. Snyder et al
as 1:2012cv01095
Plaintiff:
Deborah Turner , Tracie Stempien , Helen Miller and others
Defendant:
Rick Snyder , Maura Corrigan , Steven Hilfinger and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Turner v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv01914
Plaintiff:
Deborah Turner
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Turner v. C. R. Bard, Inc. et al
as WVS/2:12-cv-01914
Plaintiff:
Deborah Turner
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc. and Tissue Science Laboratories Limited
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
