Cases 21 - 30 of 428
Johnson v. Lumpkin
as 3:2023cv00224
Petitioner:
Chad Edward Johnson
Respondent:
TDCJ Director Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson et al v. Reed et al
as 0:2023cv02130
Plaintiff:
Paul Edward Johnson, Marcie Henning and Nada Van Asch
Defendant:
Franklin Reed, Todrick Barnette, Scott Jerry Seiler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Morrison et al v. Gogebic, County of et al
as 2:2023cv00120
Plaintiff:
Donald Morrison, Peter Shaw, Douglas Berhns and others
Defendant:
Gogebic, County of, Lisa Hewitt, Sue Pertile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv06722
Plaintiff:
EDWARD JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sundance Slope LLC v. Trout-Blue Chelan-Magi, LLC et al
as 2:2023cv00083
Plaintiff:
Sundance Slope LLC
Defendant:
Trout-Blue Chelan-Magi, LLC, Edward Johnson, Washington Orchard Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 7 U.S.C. § 2305 Unfair trade practices affecting producers Agri prod
USA v. Johnson
as 23-10214
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
James Edward Johnson
(PC) Johnson v. Young et al
as 2:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
James Edward Johnson
Defendant:
Young and O'Boyle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. $32,151.00 in United States Currency et al
as 3:2023cv00015
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
$32,151.00 in United States Currency
Claimant:
Natasha Walston and Edward Johnson
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881 Forfeiture Property-Drugs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
