Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 15-13399
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Wall, Sr. et al v. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah, Georgia et al
as 4:2012cv00101
Plaintiff:
Larry Wall, Sr. , Larry Thomas , Kimberly Thomas and others
Defendant:
The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah, Georgia and Jason Carey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Social Security Administration
as 4:2012cv00189
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Thomas
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Thomas v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2012cv00014
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Thomas
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thomas v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") et al
as 2:2011cv15670
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. ("MERS") and US Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Thomas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2010cv01551
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Solis v. Idaho Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2009cv00616
Plaintiff:
Luis Solis, Jr
Defendant:
Idaho Department of Corrections, Correctional Medical Services, Mark Gemlich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas et al v. PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P.
as 3:2009cv00807
Plaintiff:
John Thomas, Cherry R Thomas, Thomas Kimberly and others
Defendant:
PCS Nitrogen Fertilizer, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
