Cases 31 - 40 of 100
EUDY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv03112
Plaintiff:
MANDI EUDY
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC. and ELI LILLY AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Klein v. Bisignano
as 1:2026cv00043
Plaintiff:
Mandy L. Klein
Defendant:
Frank Bisignano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00289
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Ellis v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
as 1:2026cv03161
Plaintiff:
Mandi Ellis
Defendant:
Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
EUDY v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2026cv04553
Plaintiff:
MANDI EUDY
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., ELI LILLY AND COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Brown v. Cognata et al
as 1:2026cv01702
Plaintiff:
Pamela Elizabeth Brown
Defendant:
Benjamin Cognata, SC Home Holdings, LLC, Landvest Holdings, I, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 2601 Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act
Lemma Getachew, et al v. City of Willowick, et al
as 26-3363
Plaintiff:
LEMMA GETACHEW and GUENET INDALE
Defendant:
CITY OF WILLOWICK, OH, SEAN BRENNAN, AL FERRITO and others
CAIN v. BISIGNANO
as 3:2026cv00083
Plaintiff:
MANDY D. CAIN
Defendant:
FRANK J. BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Winspear v. Woody et al
as 4:2026cv00406
Plaintiff:
Bryce Winspear
Defendant:
Darius Woody and Does Charles, Nurse pm shift, Mandy, Nurse am shift, Minga, Corporal, White County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weissinger v. Culbertson et al
as 3:2026cv00516
Plaintiff:
Starla Lynette Weissinger
Defendant:
Zachary Culbertson, C. Jay Ingrum, The Ingrum Law Firm, PLLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
