Cases 41 - 50 of 5,376
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-803
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
MCCRAE v. PATRELLA et al
as 1:2024cv00279
Plaintiff:
SAMUEL MCCRAE, III
Defendant:
PATRELLA, TAMARA RUSH, MICHAEL PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HMI - Wills Point, LLC v. Wills Point, Texas et al
as 6:2024cv00114
Plaintiff:
HMI - Wills Point, LLC
Defendant:
Wills Point, Texas, Pam Pearson and City of Wills Point
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv03080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Pearson v. Lumpkin
as 24-20112
Petitioner:
Donnie Ray Pearson
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Jones-Pearson v. Lopez et al
as 1:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Airicka Jones-Pearson
Defendant:
Rafael Lopez, Rebecca Jones Gaston, Ronnica R. Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Planque v. Seattle Police Department et al
as 2:2024cv00347
Defendant:
Seattle Police Department Office of Police Accountability, Seattle Police Department, Stevens and others
Plaintiff:
Rory M Planque
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1681 Title IX Educational Amendments 1992 - Sex Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Pearson, Dennis v. Cromwell, Dan
as 3:2024cv00142
Petitioner:
Dennis E. Pearson, Jr.
Respondent:
Dan Cromwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
