Cases 1 - 10 of 3,828
Funches v. United States et al
as 1:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Cecil Funches
Defendant:
USA, Lt Renae, J Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Flowers v. Caremark PhC, L.L.C
as 4:2024cv04031
Plaintiff:
Kevin Flowers
Defendant:
Caremark PhC, L.L.C
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
B9 MF 1286 W Capitol LLC v. Dewonda Flowers et al
as 2:2024cv03149
Plaintiff:
B9 MF 1286 W Capitol LLC
Defendant:
Dewonda Flowers, Corrinn Flowers and Cristina Robles
Love v. Flowers et al
as 5:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Jerry Dean Love
Defendant:
Brandon S. Flowers A.U.S.A., F.C.I Hazelton Warden Rey, F.C.I. Hazelton S.I.S. Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCoy v. Flowers et al
as 6:2024cv00698
Plaintiff:
Idecheac A. McCoy
Defendant:
Mark Flowers, Deputy Nelson, Deputy Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flowers (PS) v. No Named Respondent
as 1:2024cv00963
Petitioner:
Kenyatta Flowers
Respondent:
No Named Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
FLOWERS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04597
Plaintiff:
MANIJHA M FLOWERS
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
McQueen v. Flowers (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tenika McQueen
Defendant:
Felicia Franklin Flowers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02633
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
