Cases 21 - 30 of 1,903
Sonoiki v. Harvard University, et al
as 24-1177
Plaintiff:
DAMILARE SONOIKI
Defendant:
HARVARD UNIVERSITY, HARVARD UNIVERSITY BOARD OF OVERSEERS and PRESIDENT AND FELLOWS OF HARVARD COLLEGE
Interested Party:
SARAH RANKIN
Rankin v. Shelby County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv02111
Plaintiff:
Jerrahmiah Rankin and Jerrahmiah J. Rankins
Defendant:
Shelby County Jail, Chief Fields and Chief Hubbard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mixson v. Louisiana Horticulture Commission et al
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Angele Mixson
Defendant:
Louisiana Horticulture Commission, Rob Barry, III, George Bofinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Porter et al v. Rankin County, Mississippi et al
as 3:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Porter and Marvin Porter
Defendant:
Rankin County, Mississippi, Bryan Bailey, Brett McAlpin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stevens v. Rankins
as 4:2024cv00053
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Stevens v. Rankins
as 6:2024cv00047
Petitioner:
Rodger D. Stevens
Respondent:
William Rankins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rankin et al v. City of Livingston, Texas et al
as 9:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Matthew Rankin, Melanie Trimble and Brandon M. White
Defendant:
City of Livingston, Texas, Kaleb Barker, Ronnie Bogany and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rankins v. Windsor Police Department
as 5:2024ct03029
Plaintiff:
Michael Rankins
Defendant:
Windsor Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rankine v. L'Oreal U.S.A. et al
as 1:2024cv00526
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Rankine
Defendant:
L'Oreal U.S.A., SoftSheen-Carson LLC. and Namaste Laboratories LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
