Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Addi et al v. W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc.
as 1:2026cv03249
Plaintiff:
LISA ADDI, JOHN J. ALESSANDRINI, KAYDIN K. AMBROSE and others
Defendant:
W. L. GORE & ASSOCIATES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnston, et al v. Intermountain Healthcare, et al
as 26-4102
Plaintiff:
SHERI JOHNSTON, AUTUMN WIDDOES, SARA HURST and others
Defendant:
INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE, INC., THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE, INC. and THE INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE BENEFITS ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE, John Does 1-20
Letang v. Diaz et al
as 3:2026cv00773
Plaintiff:
Wanda Letang
Defendant:
Chief Judge Albert Diaz, Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson, III, Judge Paul V. Niemeyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
THACKER v. BISIGNANO
as 2:2026cv00545
Plaintiff:
MISTY DAWN THACKER
Defendant:
FRANK BISIGNANO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Mark Stinson v. Memphis Light Gas & Water, et al
as 26-12577
Plaintiff:
MARK T. STINSON
Defendant:
MEMPHIS LIGHT GAS & WATER and JEREMY THACKER, individually d.b.a. Pridestaff
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv01684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thacker v. Sherman Police Department
as 4:2026cv00691
Plaintiff:
Robbie Dale Thacker
Defendant:
Sherman Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thacker v. SSA
as 6:2026cv00174
Plaintiff:
Cody Ryan Thacker
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
COSTA et al v. USA
as 1:2026cv00623
Plaintiff:
STEVE COSTA, AMELIA HAEFNER, CARLOS LEBRON-THACKER and others
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Thacker v. Sheridan et al
as 2:2026cv02473
Plaintiff:
Megan Amanda Joy Thacker
Defendant:
Jerry Sheridan and Maricopa County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
