Cases 1 - 10 of 3,758
Henry Stubbs, III v. USA, et al
as 24-1735
Plaintiff:
HENRY CHRISTOPHER STUBBS, III
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, YVETTE KANE, C. DARNELL JONES, II and others
Muhammad v. Kane
as 3:2024cv00700
Plaintiff:
Walid Abdullah Muhammad
Defendant:
Yvette Kane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kane v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01465
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Kane
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
232 West Mason LLC v. Jackson, City of, et al
as 5:2024cv11051
Plaintiff:
232 W MASON LLC
Defendant:
City of Jackson, a municipal corporation, Matthew Hagerty, Mark M. Porterfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Gould et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS et al
as 3:2024cv30033
Plaintiff:
Rodney Elliot Gould and Jonathan Chad Brown
Defendant:
COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS, Jonathan Kane, Maria C. Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kane v. Apple Inc.
as 5:2024cv02193
Plaintiff:
Lisa Johnston Kane
Defendant:
Apple Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1338
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Kane v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65190
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kane
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01493
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
