Cases 21 - 30 of 1,914
Gayton v. State
as 5:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Clifford James Gayton
Defendant:
State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gayton v. State
as 9:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Clifford James Gayton
Defendant:
State
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clifford Chaun Loyer v. City of Cypress
as 8:2024cv00368
Plaintiff:
Clifford Chaun Loyer
Defendant:
City of Cypress
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
KING v. USA
as 1:2024cv00289
Petitioner:
CLIFFORD R. KING, JR.
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Sutherland v. Warden David Paul
as 5:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Eric Clifford Sutherland and Eric C. Sutherland
Defendant:
Warden David Paul
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Andred Davis, Jr. v. Donald Ames
as 23-7291
Plaintiff:
ANDRED CLINTON DAVIS, JR.
Defendant:
DONALD F. AMES, Warden, JASON BRAGG, Unit Manager, RICHARD TONEY, Captain and others
Stroman v. Bristol County District Attorney's Office, et al
as 23-2061
Plaintiff:
EVANS EMONS STROMAN
Defendant:
BRISTOL COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, BRISTOL COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, NEW BEDFORD DISTRICT COURT and others
HONEA v. WATSON et al
as 1:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY A. HONEA
Defendant:
OFFICER WATSON, LIEUTENANT MCCORMICK, SERGEANT DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Karolski v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01960
Plaintiff:
Clifford J. Karolski
Defendant:
L. Harry, Unit Manager Ritchie, C.O. Grigas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fantel v. Penzone et al
as 2:2023cv02647
Petitioner:
Clifford John Fantel, Jr.
Respondent:
Paul Penzone and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
