Cases 21 - 30 of 66,848
Edwards v. Manning et al
as 1:2024cv00262
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Edwards
Defendant:
Jay Manning and Davyne Davis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PERDUE v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY K. PERDUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ROBERT E. CARTER, JR., DENNIS REAGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. USA
as 1:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
MARY DAVIS
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Cox, et al. v. Association of Oregon Corrections Employees, Inc., et al.
as 24-2763
Defendant:
COLETTE S. PETERS, in her official capacity as the Director of Oregon Department of Corrections, ASSOCIATION OF OREGON CORRECTIONS EMPLOYEES, INC., OREGON DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES and others
Plaintiff:
TRACY COX, MARK COX, YVONNE WILLIAMS and others
Perimeter Solutions LP v. Davis
as 4:2024cv00617
Plaintiff:
Perimeter Solutions LP
Defendant:
Thomas Davis
Rosie Davis v. William Franks
as 24-1927
Plaintiff:
Rosie L. Davis
Defendant:
William Dale Franks
Intervenor:
Arkansas Department of Education, The and Arkansas State Board of Education, The
Weeks v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Thomas W Hurst, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. ANGULO et al
as 2:2024cv05774
Plaintiff:
RUSKIN DAVIS
Defendant:
DAVID ANGULO, ARMANDO ANIDO, STEVEN C GILMAN and others
Greaves et al v. Davis
as 1:2024cv11149
Plaintiff:
Kiera Greaves and Kiera Greaves p/n/g S.C.
Defendant:
David P. Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
