Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Humphrey v. Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 4:2025cv01364
Plaintiff:
David Ray Humphrey
Defendant:
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Vest v. Keen Mountain Correctional Center
as 7:2025cv00905
Plaintiff:
Aaron David Ray Vest
Defendant:
Keen Mountain Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. City of Bellevue et al.
as 3:2025cv02001
Plaintiff:
Christopher David Ray Franklin
Defendant:
City of Bellevue, Bellevue Municipal Court, Bellevue Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Sparkman et al v. The City of Deer Park
as 4:2025cv03674
Plaintiff:
David Ray Sparkman and Roberta Leah Sparkman
Defendant:
The City of Deer Park
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Perry Mace v. Brad Eidson, et al
as 25-2462
Plaintiff:
Perry Jay Mace
Defendant:
Brad D. Eidson, State Judge Texas County, Alex Flores, Police Officer, Ozark Healthcare and others
Anglin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2025cv01304
Plaintiff:
David Ray Anglin
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Mace v. Eidson et al
as 6:2025cv03158
Plaintiff:
Perry Jay Mace
Defendant:
Brad D Eidson, Alex Flores, Ozark Healthcare and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Davis et al
as 5:2025ct03091
Plaintiff:
David Ray Whitfield, Jr.
Defendant:
Jamie Davis and Ms. Balowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
