Cases 1 - 10 of 25
John Rouse v. Jeff Johnson
as 21-6824
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN E. ROUSE
Defendant / Appellee:
JEFF JOHNSON, Major, Director, Warden and JAMES KAUN
Rouse v. Johnson
as 8:2020cv02845
Defendant:
Jeff Johnson and James Kaun
Plaintiff:
John E Rouse
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUSE JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv71338
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERRY E ROUSE JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Compton v. Pickett et al
as 4:2020cv00148
Defendant:
Gayon, Crook, Cagney Jarrod Pickett and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shamburger v. Jones et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2019cv00272
Defendant:
Karla Jones, E. Rouse, L. McDonald and others
Plaintiff:
Bobby Ray Shamburger, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rouse v. Austin Police Department et al
as 1:2015cv00721
Plaintiff:
Stephen E. Rouse
Defendant:
Austin Police Department, Housing Authority of the City of Austin, Travis County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ricky E. Rouse v. State of Wisconsin
as 16-3532
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKY E. ROUSE
Respondent - Appellee:
STATE OF WISCONSIN
Norman Rouse v. Sunset Cove Condominium
as 16-6004
Debtor:
In re: Becky Ann Spence
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Norman E. Rouse
Defendant:
Lewis Rauch, Carol L. Rauch, Gail L. Fredrick and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Sunset Cove Condominium Owners Association, Inc.
Stephen Rouse v. Austin Police Department, et al
as 15-51089
Plaintiff - Appellant:
STEPHEN E. ROUSE
Defendant - Appellee:
AUSTIN POLICE DEPARTMENT, HOUSING AUTHORITY OF THE CITY OF AUSTIN, TRAVIS COUNTY SHERIFF OFFICE and others
Rouse et al v. American Medical Systems, Inc.
as 2:2015cv07477
Plaintiff:
Jill M. Rouse and Brian E. Rouse
Defendant:
American Medical Systems, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
