Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Griffin v. Stonebreaker et al
as 1:2024cv01541
Plaintiff:
Gary Jason Griffin
Defendant:
Warden Donnie Stonebreaker, Jr, Associate Warden Gause, Associate Warden Hubbard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Nicholas LaCruze v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
as 23-3078
Plaintiff / Appellant:
NICHOLAS LACRUZE
Defendant / Appellee:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, DUANE ALSIP, JONATHAN JACKSON and others
GRIFFIN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv11345
Plaintiff:
JASON GRIFFIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Braxton v. Martinsville Police Department et al
as 7:2022cv00560
Plaintiff:
Thomas Joe Braxton, III
Defendant:
Martinsville Police Department, Officer Jason Griffin and Officer Michael Panos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Cantu v. USIC Locating Services, LLC dba USIC et al
as 4:2020cv03416
Plaintiff:
Christian Andres Cantu
Defendant:
USIC Locating Services, LLC dba USIC and Kory Jason Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Griffin v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03504
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Jason Griffin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lee v. Chilton County Board of Education et al
as 2:2018cv00806
Defendant:
Linda Hand, Pam Price, Keith Moore and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Griffin et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2015cv06461
Plaintiff:
Angela J. Griffin and Jason Griffin
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kervin et al v. Supreme Service & Specialty Company, Inc.
as 2:2015cv01172
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kervin , Nicholas Ardoin , Aubrey Lee Castille, Jr and others
Defendant:
Supreme Service & Specialty Company, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 14-3338
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
