Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Gooch v. Evers et al
as 2:2026cv02070
Defendant:
Dr Droughty, Ms Connie, Mr Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Rashad T Gooch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Mcclanahan et al
as 2:2026cv00273
Defendant:
John P. Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Mcclanahan et al
as 8:2026cv00694
Defendant:
John P. Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv12976
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
Thompson v. McClanahan et al
as 1:2026cv00216
Defendant:
John P. Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Thompson v. McClanahan et al
as 3:2026cv00934
Defendant:
John P. Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Federal Trade Commission v. Credit Glory, LLC, et al.
as 26-7370
Defendant:
LIAM PAVEL TAME TE AMORANGI TIRA EMERY, DAVID NAYLOR, in their individual and corporate capacities, JOSHUA CURTIS and others
Plaintiff:
FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Thompson v. Mcclanahan et al
as 4:2026cv01205
Defendant:
John P Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Thompson v. Mcclanahan et al
as 1:2026cv03712
Defendant:
John P. Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Thompson v. Mcclanahan et al
as 1:2026cv00383
Defendant:
John P. Burns, Dianne Renwick, Dakota Ramseur and others
Plaintiff:
Andrew Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
