Cases 1 - 10 of 35
Cohen v. Arizona Board of Regents, et al.
as 26-303
Plaintiff:
DAVID COHEN, an individual
Defendant:
ARIZONA BOARD OF REGENTS, ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY and RAYMOND ANDERSON, an individual
Aldrich et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2025cv11833
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont de Nemours Inc., Mine Respirator Company LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Aldrich, Tremaine Alexander, Gary Raymond Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Anderson v. USA
as 2:2025cv00034
Petitioner:
Raymond Anderson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Anderson v. Ludwig et al
as 2:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Oscar Raymond Anderson, Jr
Defendant:
Julie Ludwig and Wendy Mohr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02950
Plaintiff:
DEBORAH ANDERSON and RAYMOND ANDERSON
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cohen v. Arizona State University et al
as 2:2021cv01178
Plaintiff:
David Cohen
Defendant:
Arizona State University, Arizona Board of Regents and Raymond Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anderson v. Saul
as 4:2020cv05216
Defendant:
Andrew M Saul
Plaintiff:
Raymond Anderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Anderson v. Lowe's Home Centers, LLC
as 1:2020cv00967
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers, LLC doing business as Lowe's
Plaintiff:
Raymond Anderson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
ANDERSON v. MYERS
as 1:2020cv00227
Defendant:
JOHN MARTOCCIA and MATT MYERS
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COOMES v. ECKERT SEAMANS CHERIN & MELLOT, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv05952
Defendant:
PARK PALAIS LLC, ANN CLARY GORDON, ESQ., SHAPIRO SHER and others
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH COOMES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
