Cases 31 - 40 of 72
Coley v. Brazelton et al
as 1:2013cv00912
Plaintiff:
Andrew Calvin Coley
Defendant:
P. D. Brazelton, F. Martinez, De La Cruz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Villescas v. Dotson et al
as 1:2012cv02068
Plaintiff:
Alberto Villescas
Defendant:
M. T. Dotson, W. Tucker, D. Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. TUCKER
as 2:2012cv07160
Plaintiff:
CAROL BRIGGS ALI
Defendant:
LEON W. TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
McAdoo v. United States of America et al
as 1:2012cv00328
Plaintiff:
Carl E. McAdoo
Defendant:
United States of America, Sonny W. Tucker, Jr., Sandy F. Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fly Right Auto Sales, LLC et al v. Anderson Geneva Development, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv05402
Plaintiff:
Fly Right Auto Sales, LLC and Daniel W. Tucker
Defendant:
Anderson Geneva Development, Inc., Ice Castle Retirement Fund, L.L.C., Barnco, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tucker v. United States of America
as 3:2012cv00123
Petitioner:
Kenneth W. Tucker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kiderlen v. USA
as 4:2012cv00149
Plaintiff:
Steven Duane Kiderlen
Defendant:
United States of America, Barack H. Obama, United States District Court Eastern District of Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tucker v. Williams et al
as 1:2011cv00339
Plaintiff:
Jason W Tucker
Defendant:
Benjamin Williams, Justin Faw, Joshua Zigler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tucker v. Astrue
as 3:2011cv30115
Plaintiff:
Daniel W. Tucker
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Fred Tucker v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-10375
Petitioner - Appellant:
FRED W. TUCKER
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
