Cases 1 - 10 of 1,391
Barry Glenn Williams et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2024cv04071
Plaintiff:
Barry Glenn Williams and Damien Deron Williams
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles, City of Los Angeles, Carmen Trutanich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Mays et al v. Schroeder et al
as 0:2024cv01736
Plaintiff:
Yolanda Mays and Tommy Holmes
Defendant:
Andrew William Schroeder, Mark Joseph Suchta, Alan Douglas Salvosa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BOGGS v. HOLMES et al
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BOGGS
Defendant:
CHASE HOLMES, JASON MYERS, TRAVIS KEMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Holmes v. Tocco et al
as 2:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Ebony Holmes
Defendant:
Vincent Tocco, Larry Chip Filer, Larry D. Boone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
English v. Wolpert et al
as 1:2024cv00137
Plaintiff:
Leonard English, Jr.
Defendant:
Christopher M. Wolpert, David Tighe, Jerome A. Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00549
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00327
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Anderson v. City of Alameda et al
as 4:2024cv02157
Plaintiff:
Adroa Anderson
Defendant:
City of Alameda and Benjamin Holmes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
