Cases 11 - 20 of 31
PRIDDY v. MOSES CONE MEDICAL SERVICES INC, et al
as 1:2018cv00405
Plaintiff:
TONDRA PRIDDY
Defendant:
MOSES CONE MEDICAL SERVICES , THE MOSES H. CONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL , CONE HEALTH CONNECTED CARE, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Lewis v. Social Security, Commissioner of
as 2:2018cv11270
Plaintiff:
Tondra M. Lewis
Defendant:
Social Security, Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Rhode Island Homeless Advocacy Project et al v. Raimondo
as 1:2017cv00602
Plaintiff:
Rhode Island Homeless Advocacy Project , Bruce Fields , Felix Rivas and others
Defendant:
Gina Raimondo and Michael Tondra
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deverick Scott v. Randy Watson, et al
as 16-1434
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Deverick Scott
Defendant - Appellee:
Randy Watson, Warden, Varner Supermax Unit, Pace, Disciplinary Officer, Varner Supermax Unit, Williams, Disciplinary Notification Officer, Varner Supermax Unit and others
PARKER v. DAVIS et al
as 5:2015cv00271
Plaintiff:
LEE MCDANIEL PARKER
Defendant:
DAVID DAVIS, STREET, FAIR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scott v. Watson et al
as 5:2015cv00007
Plaintiff:
Deverick Scott
Defendant:
Randy Watson, Pace, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neal v. Adams et al
as 2:2014cv02360
Plaintiff:
Wendell Dwayne O'Neal
Defendant:
Lynne Adams, Christina Rubalcava, Osborn Maledon PA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv00186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Damon Lloyd v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 14-3289
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAMON S. LLOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
GARY MOHR, ROBIN KNABB, NORM ROBINSON, Warden and others
Zeune v. Mohr et al
as 2:2014cv00153
Plaintiff:
Rodney D Zeune
Defendant:
Gary Mohr, Robin Knabb, Norm Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
