Cases 31 - 40 of 63
STUMM et al v. TOWN OF PITTSBORO
as 1:2017cv04296
Plaintiff:
BRIAN T HELMER, JASON A STUMM and MATTHEW W STUMM
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT SCOTT KING, CHRISTI PATTERSON, TOWN OF PITTSBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. King et al
as 3:2017cv00618
Plaintiff:
Antonio Harris
Defendant:
Scott King and Scott Kings Legal Group
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King Consultants, Inc. et al v. Time2Share, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv00498
Plaintiff:
King Consultants, Inc. , Scott King and Sean Hornbeck
Defendant:
Time2Share, LLC, Jeffrey Kelso and William Higgins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Butler v. Forest Grove Police Department et al
as 3:2017cv00292
Defendant:
Officer Alberto, Gary Anderson, Whitney Black and others
Plaintiff:
Janell Rene Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Property Damage
Marshall et al v. Cage Water Technology LLC
as 1:2016cv00192
Plaintiff:
William Hunter Marshall , Scott King and Robert Daniel Young
Defendant:
Cage Water Technology, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Lando-King et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv15196
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Lando-King and Scott King
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
King v. Anoka County et al
as 0:2015cv03313
Plaintiff:
Arron Scott King
Defendant:
Anoka County and Kurt Duel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bright v. Corizon Health Corporation et al
as 4:2015cv00145
Plaintiff:
Micheal A. Bright
Defendant:
Corizon Health Corporation, Woodrow A. Myers, Scott Bower and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv05950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Friedler v. Corizon Correctional Healthcare Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00226
Plaintiff:
Robert Ryan Friedler
Defendant:
Corizon Correctional Healthcare, Mike Scott, Scott A. Bowers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
