Cases 81 - 90 of 134
Thomas v. Tiffany et al
as 1:2015cv00390
Plaintiff:
Tara Udayasiri Thomas
Defendant:
Dee Tiffany, Melanie Collins, Michael Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Baker et al v. Nissan North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv03709
Plaintiff:
Michael Warren Baker and Courtney Baker
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc. , Giles Automotive, Inc. and Nissan Motor Acceptance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Warren v. Long et al
as 6:2015cv03332
Plaintiff:
Michael Warren
Defendant:
Ron Long, Pulaski County Sheriff's Office, Pulaski County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Michael Cox, Jr.
as 15-40412
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL WARREN COX, JR.
Smith et al v. Eagle U S 2 L L C et al
as 2:2015cv00708
Plaintiff:
Linda S Smith , Robert W Smith , Shaune' Spencer and others
Defendant:
Eagle U S 2 L L C and David L Ardoin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Warren v. Holder
as 15-9500
Petitioner:
RUTH DANIELA WARREN, Beneficiary of a visa petition filed by Case Michael Warren
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
US v. Michael Proctor, Jr.
as 13-7915
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL WARREN PROCTOR, JR., a/k/a Michael Warran Proctor, a/k/a Marcus Jalen Taylor
GMAC Mortgage, LLC v. Michael Warren Estate et al
as 1:2013cv01798
Defendant:
Michael Warren Estate and Laverne Warren
Plaintiff:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
Counter_claimant:
Laverne Warren
Counter_defendant:
GMAC Mortgage, LLC
FREEMAN v. WARREN et al
as 1:2013cv00869
Plaintiff:
GALEN FREEMAN
Defendant:
RANDALL P. GENTRY, TIM A. GROGG, THOR R. MILLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2013cv01599
Plaintiff:
Benita S. Warren and Michael Warren
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
