Cases 21 - 30 of 41
BSN SPORTS LLC v. DAVID BOWEN
as 3:2015cv00440
Defendant:
DAVID BOWEN
Plaintiff:
BSN SPORTS LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. Arlington Estate Mobile Home Park et al
as 1:2014cv01139
Plaintiff:
Norman Thomas
Defendant:
Arlington Estate Mobile Home Park , David Bowen , Foster Potter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
MURPHY v. PALMER et al
as 3:2014cv06896
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY R. MURPHY
Defendant:
MICHAEL W. PALMER, JR., RYAN REIFF, EMMETT SMITH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ward v. Smoke et al
as 2:2014cv00675
Plaintiff:
Rhonda Ward
Defendant:
Stephanie Daniels Smoke , David Bowen , James Trey Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Farmer v. Bowen et al
as 4:2014cv00248
Plaintiff:
Kadrianne Farmer
Defendant:
David Bowen, Willie Scott and Edwards Food Giant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowen v. Nooth
as 2:2013cv00748
Petitioner:
Scott David Bowen
503) 326-5524 (fax:
Steven T. Wax
Respondent:
Mark Nooth
503) 947-4794 (fax:
Lynn David Larsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Barnes v. Pitt County Government et al
as 5:2012ct03185
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Alexander Barnes
Defendant:
Pitt County Government, North Carolina State Government, Greenville Municipal Government and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Bowen v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2010dp20054
Plaintiff:
David Bowen
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. , Thomas P. Schmalzried and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
POWE v. OFFICER SHOVLIN et al
as 3:2010cv02534
Plaintiff:
Kent Powe
Defendant:
Officer shovlin , F. Royer , David Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Bowen v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv07087
Plaintiff:
David Bowen
Defendant:
DOES, Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
