Labor Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 13,618
Phillips v. MHC
as 1:2024cv01381
Plaintiff:
Edward Phillips
Defendant:
MHC doing business as Georgia Kenworth
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Jefferson v. Aristokraft, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
Lajuan Jefferson
Defendant:
Aristokraft, Inc., Masterbrand Cabinets, LLC and Masterbrand Cabinets, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 fm Removal - Family and Medical Leave Act
Mellon v. McKibben Powersports, Inc.
as 8:2024cv00779
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Mellon
Defendant:
McKibben Powersports, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Finch v. LBF Equity LLC
as 1:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Michael Finch
Defendant:
LBF Equity LLC doing business as Lee Brass Foundry LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act (1993)
Miyler v. BNSF Railway Company
as 4:2024cv04054
Plaintiff:
Adam Miyler
Defendant:
BNSF Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
MILLER v. BRICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION et al
as 3:2024cv04340
Plaintiff:
ELIZABETH MILLER
Defendant:
BRICK TOWNSHIP BOARD OF EDUCATION, BRICK TOWNSHIP PUBLIC SCHOOLS, JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relatio
Robinson v. Coalition, Inc.
as 4:2024cv01125
Plaintiff:
Seth Robinson
Defendant:
Coalition, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Creekmore v. Truist Bank
as 2:2024cv00209
Plaintiff:
LeaAnne Creekmore
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question - Family and Medical Leave Act
Toler v. Truist Bank
as 2:2024cv00161
Plaintiff:
Shawnda Toler
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Ciara Bridges v. Skywest Airlines, Inc.
as 2:2024cv02513
Plaintiff:
Ciara Bridges
Defendant:
Skywest Airlines, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
