Cases 11 - 20 of 1,215
Hines v. Foot Locker
as 24-576
Plaintiff:
SHERELL ANN HINES
Defendant:
FOOT LOCKER, INC., SHOE SENCES, MONROE COUNTY and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00091
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Hines v. Foot Locker et al
as 6:2024cv06060
Plaintiff:
Sherell Ann Hines
Defendant:
Foot Locker, Shoe Sences, Monroe County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cartner-Eastman v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2023cv06143
Plaintiff:
Amber R Cartner-Eastman
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
McCurley v. Eastman et al
as 4:2023cv01173
Plaintiff:
Jesse L McCurley
Defendant:
Sam Eastman and Lee D Short
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Spiro v. Eastman Chemical Company
as 6:2023cv00608
Plaintiff:
Sandra Spiro
Defendant:
Eastman Chemical Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act
Hayden et al v. Monsanto Company et al
as 4:2023cv01542
Plaintiff:
Mr. Thomas Hayden, Wanda Hayden and Thomas Hayden
Defendant:
Monsanto Company, Eastman Chemical Company, Pharmacia LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Children's Hospital v. Perkins Eastman Architects DPC
as 8:2023cv03251
Plaintiff:
Children's Hospital
Defendant:
Perkins Eastman Architects DPC
3Rd Party Defendant:
AKF Group LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Robert Johnson v. Donald Trump, et al
as 23-3581
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant / Appellee:
Donald Trump, Facebook, Meta and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
