Civil Rights Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 847,477
Deising v. Wade et al
as 2:2025cv10431
Plaintiff:
Michael Lee Deising
Defendant:
Kelsey Wade, David C. Barber, Edward Gerrow and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lukas et al v. Brimacombe
as 4:2025cv10432
Plaintiff:
Cody Lukas and Justin Simpson
Defendant:
Aimee Brimacombe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2025cv00566
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Bender v. Contra Costa Criminal District Atty. et al
as 2:2025cv00018
Plaintiff:
Eric R. Bender
Defendant:
Contra Costa Criminal District Atty. and Richmond Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spooner v. Taylor et al
as 5:2025cv00015
Plaintiff:
Margaret D. Spooner
Defendant:
John M. Taylor, The City of McComb, John Doe Person(s) 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Bailey, Jr. v. Second Judicial District Court et al
as 2:2025cv00292
Plaintiff:
Melvin L. Bailey, Jr.
Defendant:
Second Judicial District Court, State of Nevada and Nevada Dept. Of Public Safety, Division of Parole and Probation
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Totaro v. Walsh
as 3:2025cv00088
Plaintiff:
Timothy John Totaro
Defendant:
Steven Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Verner v. CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2025cv01247
Plaintiff:
Paul R Verner
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, Camden County, Camden County Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2025cv01222
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.