Civil Rights Cases
Cases 91 - 100 of 754,293
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Meier v. Williams et al
as 6:2023cv03085
Plaintiff:
Aaron Edward Meier
Defendant:
Aaron Williams, Matthew Thomas Weatherman and Kim Hathcock
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dudley v. Missouri Housing Resources et al
as 4:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Gene E Dudley
Defendant:
Missouri Housing Resources, SAHFR doing business as CHES Inc, Fictious doe Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kast v. Erbacher et al
as 9:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Caitlin M. Kast
Defendant:
Patrick Erbacher and City of Missoula
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Evans v. Walton et al
as 4:2023cv00104
Plaintiff:
Teri Evans
Defendant:
Scott Walton, Michael Glover, Unknown Rogers County Deputy Sheriffs 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00499
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act of 1990
Johnson v. Rhode Island Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv00114
Plaintiff:
Ezekial Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Rhode Island Department of Corrections, Wayne T. Salisbury and JR Ventura
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01041
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
