Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 281 - 290
Washington v. Doe et al
as 3:2026cv01389
Plaintiff:
Darrell Delano Washington, II
Defendant:
John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01537
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Melton v. Federal Express Corporation
as 3:2026cv01391
Plaintiff:
Joyce Melton
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Martin et al v. SAFECO Insurance Company of America
as 1:2026cv05467
Plaintiff:
James Martin and Yuko Martin
Defendant:
SAFECO Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05457
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05450
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Spilker v. CS Wind America, Inc.
as 1:2026cv05463
Plaintiff:
Charles Spilker
Defendant:
CS Wind America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Shaner v. Commissioner
as 1:2026cv05466
Plaintiff:
Robert Blake Shaner
Defendant:
Social Security Commissioner
Interested Party:
SSA Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05459
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in - Habeas Corpus: INS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05454
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 - Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
